[postlink]http://newslightingtechnology.blogspot.com/2008/12/liquefied-petroleum-gas-so-fuel.html[/postlink]Before this I was reading the news in the newspaper Microsoft, about the use of Liquefied petroleum gas as fuel vehicle in the middle eastern country (Iraq or Palestine, sorry I forget) it made local people because the Israeli blockade of fuel supplies to the country. Several days later I was also listening to the news on a Metro TV that about people of Indonesia that successfully utilize the gas Liquefied petroleum gas as fuel motornya bicycle as a replacement for gasoline prices that want to distribute.
Since the time I was interested to mencaritahu about the possibility of the use of Liquefied petroleum gas as fuel for vehicles anticipate the scarcity of fuel. And I get the information that countries in Europe were interested to memperlajari it, and even when it was proposed Liquefied petroleum gas as fuel instead of gasoline, which is believed to be more environmentally friendly. If the offensive on environmental friendly we must remember the BBG (Fuel Gas) yagn fuel known as the most environmentally friendly vehicles, but I will try to compare the BBG (Fuel Gas) and LGV (liquiefied gas for vehicle / Liquefied petroleum gas) and fuel (Material Fuel Oil).
Source kompas.com
Liquefied petroleum gas than the merit of BBG:
BBG tank capacity is only around 17 liters of premium equivalent (LSP), while the LGV can accommodate 40 LSP. Thus, the mobility of vehicles using the same LGV vehicles using diesel or premium. Liquefied petroleum gas pressure of gas in liquid form is lower than so BBG heavy tank LGV only half of the BBG. This excess will be profitable because the owner of the vehicle during this burden is quite heavy tank of fuel gas users. Thus, a car that uses LGV can move as cars that use fuel.
Liquefied petroleum gas compared to fuel Pros:
The results of the pilot conducted with Pertamina Bandung Institute of Technology, which uses LGV Toyota Vios to indicate the level of efficiency in the use of the BBG better than fuel oil (fuel). Operational costs, for example, cheaper Rp 100 per kilometer compared to using premium fuel. In addition, higher power Torque 3 kilometers per hour, compared Pertamax. Charging LGV also faster than the BBG. LGV only takes two minutes for charging 40 LSP, while BBG takes four minutes.
LGV case the project is run properly, in addition to pressing the fuel can also increase the utilization of natural resources that can later use to reduce the income of the country. But a scar can? Yes, because Indonesia is a country-11 that have the largest reserves, and of course LGV later to take natural gas from Indonesia native who do not need to have the processing serumit processing oil. (Source id.wikipedia.org)
Indonesia Jaya will only be achieved when run correctly, and because the government of Indonesia is not filled by the party that always "hungry" I like the posting before (Indonesia Not Poor Countries).
If you are interested to modify your vehicle, a blogger has a positive intention to provide some good tips. Hopefully useful ... ....
Since the time I was interested to mencaritahu about the possibility of the use of Liquefied petroleum gas as fuel for vehicles anticipate the scarcity of fuel. And I get the information that countries in Europe were interested to memperlajari it, and even when it was proposed Liquefied petroleum gas as fuel instead of gasoline, which is believed to be more environmentally friendly. If the offensive on environmental friendly we must remember the BBG (Fuel Gas) yagn fuel known as the most environmentally friendly vehicles, but I will try to compare the BBG (Fuel Gas) and LGV (liquiefied gas for vehicle / Liquefied petroleum gas) and fuel (Material Fuel Oil).
Source kompas.com
Liquefied petroleum gas than the merit of BBG:
BBG tank capacity is only around 17 liters of premium equivalent (LSP), while the LGV can accommodate 40 LSP. Thus, the mobility of vehicles using the same LGV vehicles using diesel or premium. Liquefied petroleum gas pressure of gas in liquid form is lower than so BBG heavy tank LGV only half of the BBG. This excess will be profitable because the owner of the vehicle during this burden is quite heavy tank of fuel gas users. Thus, a car that uses LGV can move as cars that use fuel.
Liquefied petroleum gas compared to fuel Pros:
The results of the pilot conducted with Pertamina Bandung Institute of Technology, which uses LGV Toyota Vios to indicate the level of efficiency in the use of the BBG better than fuel oil (fuel). Operational costs, for example, cheaper Rp 100 per kilometer compared to using premium fuel. In addition, higher power Torque 3 kilometers per hour, compared Pertamax. Charging LGV also faster than the BBG. LGV only takes two minutes for charging 40 LSP, while BBG takes four minutes.
LGV case the project is run properly, in addition to pressing the fuel can also increase the utilization of natural resources that can later use to reduce the income of the country. But a scar can? Yes, because Indonesia is a country-11 that have the largest reserves, and of course LGV later to take natural gas from Indonesia native who do not need to have the processing serumit processing oil. (Source id.wikipedia.org)
Indonesia Jaya will only be achieved when run correctly, and because the government of Indonesia is not filled by the party that always "hungry" I like the posting before (Indonesia Not Poor Countries).
If you are interested to modify your vehicle, a blogger has a positive intention to provide some good tips. Hopefully useful ... ....
0 komentar:
Posting Komentar
thank you for your commet